Diagnosis of vision problems that can be treated with vision therapy
We see many children in our office that could have been diagnosed earlier. In many cases, parents of these children were given a false sense of security because a rudimentary vision test administered at the child’s school (usually by a nurse) had determined that the child had 20/20 vision. That determination may be correct as far as it goes but a rudimentary “vision screening” cannot test for the 15 visual skills covered in a developmental optometrist’s examination.
Not all health professionals are trained to diagnose or treat eye movement and visual processing problems
Many children have needlessly struggled through school for many years with a treatable vision problem that was finally caught when the child had an full developmental eye and vision system examination. As explained below, most professionals are not trained to look for problems in the way the eyes move or work together or whether the brain is processing visual information correctly and efficiently. Most optometrists, ophthalmologists and pediatricians are only concerned with visual acuity and do not look for the many other eye, brain and systemic problems that could be causing poor vision and poor visual system functioning.
Patients are advised to look for an developmental or behavioral optometrist who is a member of the College of Optometrists in Vision Development.
Note that not all optometrists are trained in or practice vision therapy and consequently, they may not examine their patients with a view to determining the need for vision therapy. Patients and parents should ask the proper questions:
- Will the eye examination evaluate binocular muscle strength?
- Will there be an evaluation of eye-teaming skills, focusing ability and eye movement and control?
- Will there be any testing of visual skills or perceptual abilities?
- Will the visual information processing system be evaluated?
Studies suggest that a neuro or developmental (behavioral) optometrist should be consulted
Another important point is that not all professionals are trained to assess ocular motor abilities or visual perceptual deficits. For example, the authors of a study published in the scientific journal NeuroRehabilitation cautioned that patients should be referred to an optometrist not an ophthalmologist (eye surgeon) for a proper evaluation.
The study states that patients:
should be referred to a behavioral [also known as a developmental optometrist] or neuro-optometrist. It was also noted that referrals made to an ophthalmologist may be insufficient, as they are primarily concerned with the health of the eye only, and ophthalmologists are mostly experienced with acute medical problems rather than rehabilitation issues. This assertion is supported by considering the typical components of an ophthalmologic exam, which may yield a lack of specificity, and/or provide information which is inadequately defined in terms of rehabilitation consequence. Trobe, Acosta, Kirscher and Trick identify a lack of measurement in areas of distance and near acuities, contrast sensitivity and confrontation, while Gianutsos and Matheson describe a need for greater quantification in terms of field gradations and boundaries, and binocularity conditions. A more thorough investigation is important for the rehabilitative efforts of all patients who demonstrate visual processing deficits.
The study authors go on to state that:
[o]ophthalmologists are excellent surgeons and expert at treating acute disease but their expertise does not to extend to the diagnosis or treatment of visual processing deficits."
Individuals who go to a doctor for an evaluation or a second opinion need to ensure that they go to the right doctor. Some doctors may tell the patient that there is nothing wrong when they have not performed the necessary testing.